Merge pull request #704 from EdouardVanbelle/fix/azure-enumeration
This commit is contained in:
@@ -51,6 +51,33 @@ ignore = [
|
||||
# No direct security impact; no upgrade path exists.
|
||||
"RUSTSEC-2024-0384",
|
||||
|
||||
# azure_core 0.21.0 writes the `authorization` header value to logs —
|
||||
# `policies/transport.rs` does `debug!("…{request:#?}")` over the whole
|
||||
# request. For a SharedKey entry that value is the per-request HMAC
|
||||
# signature; for a SAS entry it is the token. Severity 6.5 (medium).
|
||||
#
|
||||
# The advisory says "upgrade to >=0.22.0". That version does not exist:
|
||||
# `azure_core` jumped 0.21 → 1.x, and `azure_storage_blobs` never left
|
||||
# 0.21.0 before being archived. So the stated remedy IS the official-SDK
|
||||
# migration, tracked separately alongside the quick-xml pair above.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Not reachable at our log levels: the line is `debug!` on the
|
||||
# `azure_core::policies::transport` target, and the default filter is
|
||||
# `info`. It fires only if an operator explicitly asks for
|
||||
# `RUST_LOG=…,azure_core=debug`, which is not hypothetical — that is the
|
||||
# invocation used to diagnose the Azurite migration hang. **Do not run
|
||||
# `azure_core=debug` against a real Azure account**; it prints request
|
||||
# signatures to the terminal. Against Azurite it only exposes the
|
||||
# published dev key's signatures.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# A subscriber-level directive pinning that target off was prototyped
|
||||
# and rejected 2026-09-02 — not worth carrying a filter hack for a
|
||||
# dependency being replaced.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Un-ignore trigger: the azure_storage_blob 1.x migration lands
|
||||
# (`cargo tree -i azure_core@0.21` returns no rows).
|
||||
"RUSTSEC-2026-0275",
|
||||
|
||||
# quick-xml 0.31.0 — transitive via azure_core 0.21.0 (unofficial SDK,
|
||||
# now archived). Our direct dep is already on 0.41.0; the 0.31 copy is
|
||||
# only reachable through the azure_storage_blobs chain, which parses
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user