security(nextcloud): ocs: get only users profile session can access to
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,18 +3,25 @@
|
||||
# =============================================================
|
||||
# C4 from BASELINE_TESTS_NC_WEBDAV.md.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Deferred from Batch 1 because it needed the bob fixture
|
||||
# that `nc_second_user_setup.hurl` now provides. Pins the
|
||||
# behaviour of the existing rule in
|
||||
# `interfaces/nextcloud/ocs_handler.rs::user_provisioning_response`:
|
||||
# Post AuthZ audit #11 (2026-07-17), `user_provisioning_response`
|
||||
# no longer rolls its own admin gate — it delegates to
|
||||
# `AuthApplicationService::get_user_profile_by_username_with_perms`,
|
||||
# which shares the visibility engine with the id-keyed REST
|
||||
# endpoint at `/api/users/{id}`. Consequences for this test:
|
||||
#
|
||||
# if user.username != userid && user.role != "admin" {
|
||||
# return Json(ocs_err(403, ...)).into_response();
|
||||
# }
|
||||
#
|
||||
# i.e. you can read your own profile always; you can read
|
||||
# anyone's profile if you're admin. Bob is not admin, so bob
|
||||
# CANNOT read admin's profile (the symmetric assertion).
|
||||
# - **admin → bob**: still 200 (admin bypass is one of the
|
||||
# five visibility paths; see get_user_profile step 5).
|
||||
# - **bob → admin**: with `OXICLOUD_EXPOSE_SYSTEM_USERS=true`
|
||||
# (tests/common/server.env), both are internal so step 4
|
||||
# of the visibility engine says the target is broadly
|
||||
# visible via the system address book — bob CAN see
|
||||
# admin's basic profile. Pre-fix, the bespoke gate returned
|
||||
# `403 Insufficient privileges` and admin bypassed the
|
||||
# expose gate silently; both anomalies are gone.
|
||||
# - **bob → nonexistent**: `404 User not found`, anti-enum
|
||||
# shape identical to "you can't see this user". Audit line
|
||||
# `user_profile.rejected reason=target_username_not_found`
|
||||
# fires server-side.
|
||||
#
|
||||
# Uses admin's app password for Basic Auth (same pattern as
|
||||
# `nc_ocs_user_info.hurl`).
|
||||
@@ -82,8 +89,12 @@ jsonpath "$.ocs.data.email" == "bob@example.com"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
# C4-symmetric — bob (non-admin) CANNOT read admin's profile
|
||||
# (proves the admin-only branch isn't a no-op)
|
||||
# C4-symmetric — post-audit-#11: bob CAN read admin's profile
|
||||
# because the visibility engine's
|
||||
# `expose_system_users` branch treats internal
|
||||
# users as broadly visible via the system address
|
||||
# book. The bespoke `403 Insufficient privileges`
|
||||
# the pre-fix handler emitted is gone.
|
||||
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
GET {{base_url}}/ocs/v1.php/cloud/users/{{username}}?format=json
|
||||
[BasicAuth]
|
||||
@@ -91,7 +102,27 @@ GET {{base_url}}/ocs/v1.php/cloud/users/{{username}}?format=json
|
||||
|
||||
HTTP 200
|
||||
[Asserts]
|
||||
jsonpath "$.ocs.meta.statuscode" == 403
|
||||
jsonpath "$.ocs.meta.statuscode" == 100
|
||||
jsonpath "$.ocs.data.id" == "{{username}}"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
# C4-antienum — bob queries a genuinely nonexistent username.
|
||||
# Response body is the SAME shape as any denial
|
||||
# case: `statuscode=404 status="failure"`. The
|
||||
# NC client cannot distinguish "user doesn't
|
||||
# exist" from "you have no visibility on that
|
||||
# user" (were expose_system_users off) — which
|
||||
# is the anti-enumeration invariant this fix
|
||||
# was meant to preserve.
|
||||
# ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
|
||||
GET {{base_url}}/ocs/v1.php/cloud/users/nonexistent-audit-11-canary?format=json
|
||||
[BasicAuth]
|
||||
{{bob_nc_user}}: {{bob_nc_pw}}
|
||||
|
||||
HTTP 200
|
||||
[Asserts]
|
||||
jsonpath "$.ocs.meta.statuscode" == 404
|
||||
jsonpath "$.ocs.meta.status" == "failure"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user