Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Edouard Vanbelle 49979108f7 test(api): the blackhole trigger is detached — bound the poll, not the dispatch
Two fixes from Ed's run.

## The assertion I called load-bearing was measuring nothing

`backend_migration` is a DETACHED job: the trigger spawns the handler
and returns 202 in milliseconds, carrying no outcome and no run_id.
I had modelled it on `admin_jobs.hurl`, where the jobs are synchronous
and the response IS the outcome.

So `duration < 120000` on the trigger would have passed against the
ORIGINAL unbounded behaviour — it timed the dispatch, not the
migration. The one assert the file existed for proved nothing.

The bound is now a polling budget: `/runs?limit=1` with `retry: 60`,
`retry-interval: 2000`. 120s, then hurl fails on the last assert.
Against a 15-minute hang the row sits in `Running` and the budget
exhausts, which is the failure this file is for. `run_id` comes from
`$[0].id` (runs are `ORDER BY started_at DESC`), since the 202 body
has none.

## A count assert on a registry, again

`storage_multi_entry.hurl` asserted `$.entries count == 3` and
`s3_blackhole` made it 4. The failure reads "expected 3, got 4",
naming neither the entry that appeared nor whether it belonged.

Replaced with per-name `contains`, which is what a registry wants:
membership asserted per item, so declaring a new entry does not break
an unrelated file. Positional asserts stay — entry ORDER is a separate
property and a real one, since the boot fallback picks `[0]` when no
active pointer exists.

Its comment also said "Two entries declared" while asserting three:
the drift a count invites, visible in the same three lines.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-08 08:51:40 +02:00
Edouard Vanbelle 2ff8a77331 test(api): pin that an unreachable backend pauses in bounded time
The regression test `docs/plan/jobs-handling-recoverable-error.md`
§Testing asks for: assert the run reaches Paused, that `error_message`
names the cause, and that it does so in bounded time rather than
hanging.

## The endpoint has to HANG, not refuse

`s3_stub` already existed and points at `127.0.0.1:9999`, where nothing
listens. That connection is REFUSED — ECONNREFUSED, immediately — and
that path was never broken. A test built on it would pass with no
timeout configured anywhere, which is worse than no test: it would read
as coverage of exactly the failure it cannot see.

So `s3_blackhole` points at `192.0.2.1`, TEST-NET-1 (RFC 5737),
reserved for documentation and guaranteed unrouted. A SYN goes
unanswered — no RST, no ICMP — which is the failure that used to hang
until the OS abandoned TCP retransmission ~15 minutes later, with the
job neither running nor failed the whole time.

Ed's suggestion, and it is the right fixture: a server that never
answers is reproducible in a way that unplugging a cable is not.

## The load-bearing assertion is `duration`

Every other assert in the file would also pass against the old hanging
behaviour, given fifteen minutes. `duration < 120000` is the only one
that fails if the bound is ever removed. The threshold is deliberately
loose — three orders of magnitude from the failure it guards, so a slow
runner cannot make it flaky.

## Why it is safe in the shared suite

The run fails at `target.initialize()`, which is BEFORE
`migration_readonly` is engaged, so this file cannot leave the server
read-only for whatever runs next. A mid-copy failure would have held
the freeze — that is why this shape was chosen.

Teardown is mandatory rather than tidy: `open_or_start` picks up the
latest non-terminal row, so a Paused row left behind would be RESUMED
by the next `backend_migration` trigger in the suite, silently
retargeting an unrelated test at the black hole. The file cancels its
own run and asserts the row reached Cancelled.

Placed second-to-last. It is the slowest file in the suite by design —
it waits out an unreachable endpoint to prove the wait is bounded — so
that cost lands after everything else has reported. Azurite stays last
for the reason its own comment gives.

Not yet executed: the suite tears down containers and Ed usually has a
run in flight.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-08 08:38:08 +02:00