f70dffeaf5
read_blob_stream / read_blob_range_stream reassembled a CDC file by fetching its chunks with `buffered(1)` — strictly sequential, so the next chunk's backend fetch (a file `open` locally; a full request round-trip on S3/Azure) only started after the current chunk was fully drained. A benchmark of the exact pipeline (stream::iter(chunks).map(get).buffered(K) .try_flatten()) showed a blind `buffered(4)` is the WRONG fix: on a local disk it is neutral on a warm page cache and ~37% SLOWER cold, because concurrent opens turn one sequential read into several competing random-I/O streams over content-addressed (scattered) chunk files. The win is entirely on remote backends, where per-chunk request latency dominates and overlapping fetches hide it (≈ linear in K). So the read-ahead depth is now a backend hint, not a constant: - BlobStorageBackend::read_prefetch() default 1 (sequential; safe for local). - S3 / Azure override to 8 (overlap GETs to hide TTFB). - cached / encrypted / retry / migration delegate to the backend that serves the bytes. - Both CDC read paths use `self.backend.read_prefetch().max(1)`. Net: local backend unchanged (no regression); remote reassembly ~4-8x faster. Ordered `buffered` (not buffer_unordered) keeps chunks in sequence. Bench (per-chunk fetch-latency model): buffered(1)->(4)/(8) = x3.9 / x7.8 @1ms, x4.0 / x8.1 @5ms, x4.0 / x8.0 @20ms. Local warm: 230ms@1 vs 227ms@4 (noise); local cold: 425ms@1 vs 585ms@4 (why local stays at 1). https://claude.ai/code/session_01DCszkkU11LYxMEUWr4setK