Files
Oxicloud/docs/architecture/index.md
T
Edouard Vanbelle eb2ae2a96d docs(architecture): derived and attached blobs
Step 12. The two tables existed with COMMENT ON text, but nothing
explained the pair together — and the relationship is the part that
matters: they hold the same kind of artifact under two different keys,
and the keying difference is a security boundary.

Content keying shares one derivation across identical bytes, which is
free and correct for something the server derived. Apply it to
user-supplied bytes and uploading a file whose content matches someone
else's lets you replace the preview they see. A single table with a
`kind` column cannot express that: the key has to be one thing or the
other, and either choice is wrong for half the rows. The split is the
enforcement, which is why the two import jobs each refuse the other's
filenames rather than one job handling both trees.

Covers structure, negative rows and what may not become one, the NULL
trap (comparison against NULL silently excludes negative rows —
correct for refcounts, wrong for dangling checks, fatal for
enumeration; all three have been hit), why `variant` carries the format
on one table and not the other, lifecycle and which consistency job
covers which failure, worked examples, and a decision rule for adding a
third artifact type.

Records `content_type`-as-key as a rejected alternative: reasonable
until negative rows made the column nullable, and PostgreSQL does not
allow a nullable column in a primary key. Worth writing down because a
later feature retroactively eliminated an option that would have looked
sound at the time.

Named for the two things rather than "satellite tables" — that is
internal shorthand nobody would search for, while `derived` and
`attached` are the words the schema and jobs already use. Mentioned once
in the intro so the code's collective noun still resolves.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-08-31 19:08:17 +02:00

80 lines
4.2 KiB
Markdown

# Internal Architecture
OxiCloud follows a **hexagonal (ports & adapters) architecture** with four layers:
```
┌───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Interfaces │ REST API, WebDAV, CalDAV, CardDAV, WOPI │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Application │ Use cases, DTOs, port definitions │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Domain │ Entities, business rules, repository traits │
├───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Infrastructure│ PostgreSQL, filesystem, caching, auth │
└───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```
All cross-layer dependencies point **inward** via trait-based ports. The DI container (`AppServiceFactory`) wires concrete implementations at startup.
## Storage Model: 100% Blob Storage
- **File metadata** (name, folder, size, user, timestamps, trash status) → PostgreSQL (`storage.files`)
- **File content** → content-addressed blobs via DedupService at `.blobs/{prefix}/{hash}.blob`
- **Folder structure** → purely virtual, rows in `storage.folders` (no filesystem directories per user)
- **Trash** → soft-delete flags on files/folders, exposed via `storage.trash_items` VIEW
## Dependency Injection
`AppServiceFactory` in `src/common/di.rs` builds all services in a defined order:
1. **Core services** — paths, content cache, thumbnails, chunked upload, transcode, dedup, compression
2. **Repositories** — `FolderDbRepository`, `FileBlobReadRepository`, `FileBlobWriteRepository`, `TrashDbRepository`
3. **Trash service** (if enabled)
4. **Application services** — folder, file upload/retrieval/management, search, i18n
5. **Share service** (if enabled)
6. **DB services** — favorites, recent, storage usage, auth
7. **CalDAV/CardDAV services**
8. **ZIP service** (last, depends on file & folder services)
9. **Assemble `AppState`**
## AppState Shape
The assembled `AppState` groups the application into a few stable buckets:
- `core` for cross-cutting runtime services such as path resolution, caching, chunked uploads, deduplication, compression, thumbnails, and ZIP handling
- `repositories` for PostgreSQL-backed folder, file, trash, and i18n persistence
- `applications` for the use-case layer exposed to handlers
- optional auth, admin, trash, share, favorites, recent, storage usage, calendar, and contact services when those features are enabled
This lets handlers depend on stable interfaces while the concrete implementation details stay inside the DI container.
## Project Structure
```
src/
├── common/ # Config, DI container, errors
├── domain/ # Entities, repository traits
├── application/ # Use cases, DTOs, port traits
├── infrastructure/ # PostgreSQL repos, filesystem, caching
└── interfaces/ # HTTP handlers, WebDAV, CalDAV, CardDAV
```
## Key Metrics
| Metric | Value |
|--------|-------|
| Rust source files | ~170 |
| Lines of code | ~50 000 |
| Automated tests | 222+ |
| Docker image | ~40 MB |
## Further Reading
- [ReBAC Authorization →](/architecture/rebac-authorization)
- [Caching Architecture →](/architecture/caching)
- [Resource Listing API →](/architecture/resource-listing)
- [Storage Quotas →](/architecture/storage-quotas)
- [Backend Storage →](/architecture/backend-storage)
- [Derived and Attached Blobs →](/architecture/derived-and-attached-blobs) — thumbnails, transcodes and uploaded previews: why content-keyed and file-keyed artifacts need separate tables
- [Background Jobs →](/architecture/jobs)